Difference between revisions of "Five pillars theory"
(New page: Somewhat controversial theory formulated by Tao Tan in 2004. Basically, it goes like this. There are five pillars that define the greatness of a university. They are (in no particular...) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:* Science & engineering | :* Science & engineering | ||
| − | Columbia's institutional agenda ought to focus on strengthening those five pillars, and not things like sustainable development, globalization, public health, arts, or postmodernist feminist deconstructionist critiques of Marxism. | + | Columbia's institutional agenda ought to focus on strengthening those five pillars, and not things like sustainable development, globalization, public health, arts, or postmodernist feminist deconstructionist antihegemonist critiques of Marxism. |
Revision as of 17:39, 29 March 2007
Somewhat controversial theory formulated by Tao Tan in 2004.
Basically, it goes like this. There are five pillars that define the greatness of a university. They are (in no particular order):
- Undergraduate education and quality of life
- Law
- Business
- Medicine
- Science & engineering
Columbia's institutional agenda ought to focus on strengthening those five pillars, and not things like sustainable development, globalization, public health, arts, or postmodernist feminist deconstructionist antihegemonist critiques of Marxism.
