User talk:Ttan

		PrezBo Award
		For your excellent contributions on Columbia's glorious and less glorious history. Admin 04:41, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Woo! Thanks! Ttan 05:41, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Spectacular Failure

Great example! Got any others? 207.237.223.150 13:00, 11 March 2007 (PDT)

I'll ask. Ttan 13:02, 11 March 2007 (PDT)

Naughty Boy

You removed the quote! Feinstein 21:48, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Not the most outrageous thing I've ever said.Ttan 22:13, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

True, but none of that other stuff is printable. Feinstein 22:48, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Smit & Nobility

I added pages on J. W. Smit and Nobility and Civility. I assume you can expand them considerably? Pacman 14:46, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Please Stop

Please do not change sorority information. The stuff you have put up about two sororities is inaccurate and biased. You are a male and therefore not in a sorority. Since I was involved in making one of the websites, I am personally offended by you and Nonsensical continually putting up these statements. Neither sorority protested against the other about something as trivial as a website page designed by the Macintosh program iWeb. The templates are similar because they are just that: Templates. The iWeb template makes the headings in that format. Neither sorority sought to copy the other, it's just "nonsensical." No one even looks at sorority websites before going through recruitment so having a cat-fight over such nonsense would be futile. Again, I wouldn't even care but I helped make one of the websites and it really hurts my feelings that someone went to such great lengths to make it look like the websites were designed specifically to target each other.

• I didn't put up any information. Nonsensical wrote everything. I just reverted what to me looked like vandalism attempts (eg. deleting all information from a page). Please clear this up with Nonsensical. Ttan 10:56, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
• Vandilism is writing slanders about people (eg. calling them plaigerizers and generalizing about them without knowledge). Deleting information that can be taken as defamatory is not vandalism. And like CU Wiki is of a high enough status that deleting a page is seen as so freaking sacriligous is way beyond me. I only found the stupid sorority pages because my friend was googling himself and found that he was in this brilliantly upkept (eg. updated every 5 seconds by an alum who thinks he is Captain Columbia and has all the authority on CU insider information) website. Since YOU protected it, YOU can delete stuff that is rude and uncalled for. As noted on this site, sorority life is only 8% of Columbia. NOBODY CARES! I care because I helped make one of the websites, but no one else even knows what four sororities are on campus. Making up stupid gossip isn't going to delight any of your eager WikiCU readers. I promise. So please get off your high horse and just delete it so I can stop feeling upset about a website that wasn't copied. Just please. Realize that you don't know me and can have no idea how offensive little italicized remarks can be to some people. Hiding behind a computer screen doesn't make you any less culpable.

• Vandalism is willful destruction or defacement of property and content. Slander is the posting of untrue and harmful information about people. If you think Nonsensical has slandered you, then take it up with him on his talk page or email the admin at admin@wikicu.com. Both are fairly reasonable guys. Do not, however, wantonly delete all content from a page. And personal insults won't get you terribly far on this site. Ttan 11:26, 1 June 2007 (EDT)