Talk:Columbia-Barnard relationship
Revision as of 11:01, 19 June 2007 by Nonsensical (talk | contribs)
There is far too much text before the table of contents. To whoever wrote it... please break it down! Reaganaut 11:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
- I've edited this about a half dozen times, and I think it finally makes some sense, though it's still a bit partisan (I plan on working on that more later). I can't think of a good way to break it down. Isn't there a wiki-command for moving the ToC to the top of the article? Absentminded 12:36, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
Moved "Equal billing vs. separate identity" section to new article Complaints about Barnard. --Nonsensical 12:01, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
NPOV Dispute
This is a page that's really important to keep as factual as possible and not promote any sort of agenda of what Barnard should do. Most of it does a pretty good job of this, but the petty nitpicking is mostly first person from a writer who is just advocating his own views on what should change at Barnard. Nonsensical 13:07, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- These "shoulds" ought to be corralled in a section on "proposals to amend the Barnard-Columbia relationship" or somesuch Pacman 13:11, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- I want to know why I never got a Barnard email address. How was a professor that didn't use courseworks supposed to know that I wasn't a Barnard student... I mean besides the fact that I didn't have boobs.wang 15:14, 9 June 2007 (EDT)
- NPOV complaint withdrawn after cleanup --Nonsensical 12:01, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
