Talk:Five pillars theory
Revision as of 21:06, 2 May 2007 by Stephen.wang (talk | contribs)
Nomination for Deletion
- Delete/Move - Or at the very least move to the failed attempt at Humor category Nonsensical 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "opinions", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "editorializing rhetoric". − Reaganaut 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- Delete Umlund 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- Move - it can go under Tao Tan, possibly Pacman 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. Feinstein 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep+Move Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?wang 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
