Talk:Five pillars theory

From WikiCU
Revision as of 20:50, 3 May 2007 by Newyorker (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Nomination for Deletion

  • Delete/Move - Or at the very least move to the failed attempt at Humor category Nonsensical 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "opinions", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "editorializing rhetoric".  − Reaganaut  14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Delete Umlund 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Move - it can go under Tao Tan, possibly Pacman 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. Feinstein 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep+Move Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?wang 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Onanism: i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.Umlund 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Excellent suggestion! Although a category would be more appropriate than a template.  − Reaganaut  14:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)


Since when is Amherst a university?

Retrieved from "https://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Talk:Five_pillars_theory&oldid=12712"